Author Archives: John Kineman

His video on Big Theory of Everything describes a relational holon, DSRP. http://www.cabreraresearch.org/tabs/videos It is the same as R-theory, but we may have found different logical properties of it. JK On Oct 13, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Jack Ring <jring7> … Continue reading →

I’ll be teaching a sustainable systems class this Fall and the Univ. of Colorado. I can’t push a particular theory, especially my own, but I can hint at it and I’m hoping through student driven enquiry we can arrive at … Continue reading →

Hi Glen, I think that’s right, there is a natural separation of functions that has to take place for a system to do its two essential things in complex relation: (1) exist, (2) operate. We also can see in Rosen’s … Continue reading →

I sent this comment to Johan Masreliez, author of the Scale Expanding Cosmos (also a popular book titled “The Progression of Time”) and in full agreement he is forwarding the comment to other lists. We have found that our cosmological … Continue reading →

OK, it is too much for email, but please look at http://69.195.124.95/~nexialor/relational-science That will seem confusing, but there are pages and posts where I try to make it more understandable. Initially it is not intuitive to Western trained minds. I … Continue reading →

Just a contribution…. There is technically no way to strictly ‘falsify’ a TOE assumption. It is like saying the explanation of the universe is that everything is constituted from X-beans that can’t be observed and then saying what the rules … Continue reading →

This is an explanation of the modification I made in category theory symbols in R-theory from . Rosen used category theory to loosen up the formalism of cause and effect. Entailments are more general. Then one can decide what kind of … Continue reading →

I wrote this reply to a colleague on an e-list who was trying to explain “Kineman” idea to another colleague. The concept if amazingly simple once you allow you mind to think in terms of simultaneous realities. In other words, … Continue reading →

This is a copy of a recent email list comment about the limits of science. Robert Rosen wrote a book about “The limits of the Limits of Science”. These ideas, I believe, would be compatible with his writing First, the … Continue reading →